cmeta
experimental gismu x_{1} is meta to/an example of x_{2} that describes such an object/concept/notion/system/topic/etc., being meta in property/aspect x_{3}, and which has features x_{4}, governed by/considered in system/considerations/epistemology/theory x_{5}; x_{1} is meta (a particular type of abstraction of x_{2} so as to apply to itself in some sense); x_{1} is an/a piece of/an example of x_{2} that applies fractally thereto Does not (necessarily) mean "beyond", "after", "beside"; in some (rather pictoral) senses, these meanings may be necessary but not sufficient for being meta in this sense; thus, "metaphysics" should not be translated using this word. x1 is an object, notion, topic, system, etc. which applies to x2 but which is itself an example thereof; for example, the meanings of the words "metalinguistics" and "metadata" are meta in this sense. It is not necessarily directly selfreferential, but could be fractally applicative. x1 is an X that is about (another) X; x1 is an abstraction of X so as to apply to X. x1 does not necessarily abstract [from] (in one sense), but is abstract to, x2. See also: xulta (generalized/weaker), sucta.


xulta
experimental gismu x_{1} is beyond/beside/abstract/meta (older sense) to x_{2} so as to be an abstraction thereof/external thereto, being so beyond/abstract in property/aspect x_{3}, and having features x_{4}, governed by/considered in system/considerations/epistemology/theory x_{5}; x1 is conceptually beyond/external to/higher up than x_{2} (in, for example, existential or consideration precedence) x1 need not be an abstraction *of* x2, but must be abstract *to* it. The word "metaphysics" could be translated with/using this word. All meta things (in the sense of cmeta) are necessarily xulta, but the converse is not true; may also include all things that are sucta. This word is different from sucta in that no concept or properties need to be generalized/simplified/idealized/abstracted from x2 in order to produce x1 (by some rules); x1 is just an object/concept/system/etc. that exists beyond/external to x2 (in some "higher plane", so to speak). Do not confuse with: xutla. Proposed short rafsi: xut. See also: cmeta, sucta.


praperi
fu'ivla x_{1} is a strict/proper subx_{2} [structure] in/of x_{3}; x_{2} is a structure and x_{1} and x_{3} are both examples of that structure x_{2} such that x_{1} is entirely contained within x_{3} (where containment is defined according to the standard/characteristics/definition of x_{2}; but in any case, no member/part/element that belongs to x_{1} does not also belong to x_{3}) but there is some member/part/element of x_{3} that does not belong to x_{1} in the same way. If x2 is a (sub)set, then x1 is a proper subset of x3; if x2 is a mathematical/algebraic (sub)group, then x1 is a proper subgroup of x3; etc. Can also be used for describing proper sublakes (such as Lake Michigan), proper superselma'o, and other nonmathmetical usages. x3 is a proper superx2 of/with x1. Biological taxa, if comparable, are usually/hypothetically proper. See also: klesi, cmeta.
